Open pnoll1 opened 4 years ago
Machine doesn't know that it's bad data, but it could check to see if the row count changed significantly and flag it as an error. I think the system that @ingalls is working on to replace machine should provide for this.
Is there a roadmap or public code to track progress on this?
Yes, you can see the new processing system here: https://github.com/openaddresses/batch
Machine accepts bad data from source making it the last successful run and what gets packaged in the data downloads.
Example:Franklin County WA 28,619 addresses to 37
Marking the run as failed and returning the previously cached result would be much better for data consumers.