Open brando90 opened 1 year ago
Hi Brando! I have no idea about classical SMT/ATP solvers, would you name some of them?
Of course!
CVC5, Vampire, Z3 and I bet many more! I don't know what format of theorems they take but I'm guessing they are FOL. I hope to find out more and help with this issue eventually :)
Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg
From: Kunhao ZHENG @.> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 8:18:44 PM To: openai/miniF2F @.> Cc: Brando Miranda @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [openai/miniF2F] FOL/SMT classical tools support? (Issue #122)
Hi Brando! I have no idea about classical SMT/ATP solvers, would you name some of them?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openai/miniF2F/issues/122#issuecomment-1299509640, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOE6LWS4Z7D4BRXN3QHQ5DWGHMRJANCNFSM6AAAAAARTXFK4M. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
If you run Isabelle's sledgehammer or coqhammer they usually say which atp they are running in your current open goals.
Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg
From: Brando Miranda @.> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 10:25:47 PM To: openai/miniF2F @.>; openai/miniF2F @.> Cc: Author @.> Subject: Re: [openai/miniF2F] FOL/SMT classical tools support? (Issue #122)
Of course!
CVC5, Vampire, Z3 and I bet many more! I don't know what format of theorems they take but I'm guessing they are FOL. I hope to find out more and help with this issue eventually :)
Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg
From: Kunhao ZHENG @.> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2022 8:18:44 PM To: openai/miniF2F @.> Cc: Brando Miranda @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [openai/miniF2F] FOL/SMT classical tools support? (Issue #122)
Hi Brando! I have no idea about classical SMT/ATP solvers, would you name some of them?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openai/miniF2F/issues/122#issuecomment-1299509640, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOE6LWS4Z7D4BRXN3QHQ5DWGHMRJANCNFSM6AAAAAARTXFK4M. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
as far as i know there is no undergoing efforts on porting minif2f to these solvers. would like to know if this is in principle feasible?
Would love to know if this is feasible for sue. Do you know? I will ask my circle of connections.
Get Outlook for Androidhttps://aka.ms/AAb9ysg
From: Kunhao ZHENG @.> Sent: Wednesday, November 2, 2022 7:02:47 PM To: openai/miniF2F @.> Cc: Brando Miranda @.>; Author @.> Subject: Re: [openai/miniF2F] FOL/SMT classical tools support? (Issue #122)
as far as i know there is no undergoing efforts on porting minif2f to these solvers. would like to know if this is in principle feasible?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHubhttps://github.com/openai/miniF2F/issues/122#issuecomment-1301562411, or unsubscribehttps://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AAOE6LV3LHVQJCQF3GCALXDWGMMMPANCNFSM6AAAAAARTXFK4M. You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
I know Lean is a higher order logic...but it would be nice to have a benchmark where classical SMT methods can be benchmarked too. What is the possibility/effort/path to translate miniF2F to a format compatible with classical SMT/ATP solvers?