openairplay / airplay2-receiver

AirPlay 2 Receiver - Python implementation
2.13k stars 133 forks source link

use an interface IP instead of loopback #6

Closed systemcrash closed 3 years ago

systemcrash commented 3 years ago

Fixes startup problems and no longer mandates IPv6.

See https://github.com/ckdo/airplay2-receiver/pull/16 for discussion

Neustradamus commented 3 years ago

@PaulWieland: What do you think?

Neustradamus commented 3 years ago

@systemcrash: Can you add the new PR?

@PaulWieland: The other PR is good for you?

Thanks.

Neustradamus commented 3 years ago

@systemcrash: Any news about it?

systemcrash commented 3 years ago

You can pick it from a branch in my repo. https://github.com/systemcrash/airplay2-receiver/tree/set_interface_ip I have been using it by default.

Nobody else seems interested in this repo...

Neustradamus commented 3 years ago

It is really used. It is for this that you can do PRs and merge directly here...

TheSpookyCat commented 3 years ago

Would love to see this, had to temporarily comment out all the IPV6-related

systemcrash commented 3 years ago

It is for this that you can do PRs and merge directly here...

@Neustradamus I cannot merge by myself, if that's what you meant...

TheSpookyCat commented 3 years ago

It is for this that you can do PRs and merge directly here...

Neustradamus I cannot merge by myself, if that's what you meant...

Is the maintainer of this repo active at all? If not, would it not be wise for someone with a lot of knowledge and input on this repo, let's say you Paul, to create an indirect fork to which people can effectively contribute to and use?

There are many great contributions that seem to be almost left for dead.

Neustradamus commented 3 years ago

@systemcrash: And now? :)

All people are welcome to join the team!

systemcrash commented 3 years ago

I see it now 😄 Thank you.

systemcrash commented 3 years ago

We'll get it fixed. Otherwise you can pick from my repo, although if you have some finished work, send PRs here.

Is the maintainer of this repo active at all? If not, would it not be wise for someone with a lot of knowledge and input on this repo, let's say you Paul, to create an indirect fork to which people can effectively contribute to and use?