Closed jimhooker2002 closed 6 years ago
Merging #5 into master will decrease coverage by
7.98%
. The diff coverage is22.22%
.
@@ Coverage Diff @@
## master #5 +/- ##
============================================
- Coverage 70.07% 62.09% -7.99%
Complexity 46 46
============================================
Files 9 10 +1
Lines 264 306 +42
Branches 51 59 +8
============================================
+ Hits 185 190 +5
- Misses 73 107 +34
- Partials 6 9 +3
Impacted Files | Coverage Δ | Complexity Δ | |
---|---|---|---|
...ls/jackson/dataformat/hal/SimpleCURIEProvider.java | 0% <0%> (ø) |
0 <0> (?) |
|
...openapitools/jackson/dataformat/hal/HALMapper.java | 36.36% <0%> (-13.64%) |
2 <0> (ø) |
|
.../dataformat/hal/ser/HALBeanSerializerModifier.java | 100% <100%> (ø) |
3 <1> (ø) |
:arrow_down: |
.../jackson/dataformat/hal/ser/HALBeanSerializer.java | 67.25% <12.5%> (-15.89%) |
3 <0> (ø) |
|
...tools/jackson/dataformat/hal/JacksonHALModule.java | 66.66% <60%> (-33.34%) |
2 <1> (ø) |
Continue to review full report at Codecov.
Legend - Click here to learn more
Δ = absolute <relative> (impact)
,ø = not affected
,? = missing data
Powered by Codecov. Last update eddef1e...45079b5. Read the comment docs.
Closing in favour of https://github.com/openapi-tools/jackson-dataformat-hal/pull/6 based on previous feedback.
As the title suggests - just scratched out something quickly to show what I'm thinking. If it looks like this is going in the right direction then I can add tests, tidy-up etc.
Note - the only testing I've done on this so far is that it compiles and the existing tests pass. Far from "production" ready just yet.