SPARQL ask has components? issue specific for FDP to RDF transformation

openbudgets / pipeline-fragments

Reusable fragments of LinkedPipes ETL pipelines

2 stars 3 forks source link

SPARQL ask has components? issue specific for FDP to RDF transformation #1

Closed marek-dudas closed 8 years ago

marek-dudas commented 8 years ago

In the DCV validation: SPARQL ask has components? Incorrectly fails on

using qb:componentAttachment
- That might be solved by adding more original DCV rdf definitions, but that makes debugging harder
Using auxilliary "fdprdf" properties annotations that control the fdptordf transformation

Quick fix: edited the dpu (in my personal pipeline) to check only for component properties linked with qb:dimension or qb:attribute or qb:measure

jindrichmynarz commented 8 years ago

Can you share the pipeline to replicate this issue?

As a safe-check, have you applied the DCV validation to data in the normal form? Validation must be preceded by normalization, otherwise it doesn't work.

marek-dudas commented 8 years ago

It's not an actual issue, it's rather that my DCV data contain additional non-dcv annotations linked for convenience to DCV entities. I already edited the validation pipeline so that it does not fail on this data. That is here http://obeu.vse.cz:9080/#/pipelines/edit/canvas?pipeline=http:%2F%2Fobeu.vse.cz:9080%2Fresources%2Fpipelines%2Fcreated-1463673163706

jindrichmynarz commented 8 years ago

Additional non-DCV annotations of observations should be valid. If the validation pipeline reports them as bugs, then the pipeline is buggy.

However, I still don't see the problem. Can you say which integrity constraint fails? As far as I see from the execution of the pipeline you provided, no integrity constraint violations are reported.

marek-dudas commented 8 years ago

Seems alright when testing now, closing the issue.