Closed miku closed 4 years ago
According to timeit, this implementation takes 4.07 µs ± 29.1 ns per loop, as opposed to 7.18 µs ± 43.4 ns per loop for the previous version.
Tested on all ISSN.
According to timeit, this implementation takes 4.07 µs ± 29.1 ns per loop, as opposed to 7.18 µs ± 43.4 ns per loop for the previous version.
Tested on all ISSN.