Closed fgregg closed 9 years ago
Why not extend the related entities stuff?
That would suggest that one event is the parent event, wouldn't it? I don't think that's right.
for a related event? Not that I know of - an event presenter isn't the parent of the event
I agree it would be good to have these coinciding events be referenced in each other in a 'related_events' like field. But in order to do that, all the coinciding events would have to be in the database. Right now they can't be because of the duplicate detection.
Dupe unduping would only happen if they have the same description
So this is to support two events that look identical but actually aren't? Do you mean Agenda? I don't understand this yet
https://github.com/opencivicdata/pupa/blob/master/pupa/importers/events.py#L31-L40
Unless they all match, it's not a dupe. Something else is going on.
Closing this, we don't need to modify the schema to work around this stuff. At most we'd adjust events, but I don't understand why we would need to yet -- if they dupe, that would mean the objects have the same name
, description
, start_time
, end_time
, timezone
, and jurisdiction
. I don't think that's the case with two events at the same time, since they'd have unique name
/descriptions
Proposal for coinciding events.