Closed jamesturk closed 7 years ago
I suppose we could have these sources added under sources
? Otherwise we might end up having sources for individual properties all over the place.
that seems right to me On Sep 25, 2015 10:07, "James McKinney" notifications@github.com wrote:
I suppose we could have these sources added under sources? Otherwise we might end up having sources for individual properties all over the place.
— Reply to this email directly or view it on GitHub https://github.com/opencivicdata/docs.opencivicdata.org/issues/54#issuecomment-143233386 .
If using the existing sources
is the way to go, then there is no need to change the OCDEP.
Right now a source field provides two fields, note
and url
. Since the person and organization images fields are already urls, is the thinking that we should duplicate the image url into the source url?
The image field on Person and Organization models are only for a URL string. It seems metadata attributing credit or name of the source for the photo (GPO Member Guide) and a possible note (e.g. "Official Congress Headshot") would provide more complete information about the photo.
via @crdunwel https://github.com/opencivicdata/python-opencivicdata-django/issues/41