Feedback: Aggregation by NG Zones

[peterdudfield]

Detailed Description

It might be a good idea to aggregate by NG zones.

Context

• Could be these
• We've also discussed Wind constraint boundaries too
• Could be DNO's too

Possible Implementation

• Todo

[dantravers]

https://assets.elexon.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/28170121/CVA_CC235.pdf

[peterdudfield]

Here's some groupings that might help

zones['z1'] = [139,288, 203,57,43, 138, 179, 262,12,6, 18, 94,42,114, 204, 108,154,115,59,239,127,29, 87]
zones['z2'] = [125,225,259, 224,195, 21,282, 232,313,120,99,77,248,311,121, 39]
zones['z3'] = [284,236,50, 98]
zones['z4'] = [11,173,241, 168, 293, 73, 192, 10,200, 268, 277,147,33,46,2,81,247,303,153,97, 193, 93, 62,183,132,131,278, 85, 260,]
zones['z5'] = [22,102,96,71,145, 128,61,95,51, 208,130,198, 185, 161, 184, 252, 170, 171, 172,205,234, 76,244, 129,105, 69,104,
               14,270,149,84,159,31, 79,106,70,167,15,137, 279, 112, 80,44,90,82,265,86,285,306,263,133,91,107,134,141,255, 169,63,
               222, 58,237,123,304,35,223, 83]
zones['z6'] = [228,27,143, 215,178,144,301,271,276,124,294, 272,275,218,146,253]
zones['z7'] = [220,177,119,78, 254,136,162,52,89, 118,235,175, 289,287]
zones['z8'] = [316,230,292,182,72, 25,54,126,122,56,148,231, 28,249,186,165,163,305,37,264,166,273,109,36,221,240,267,312,60,156,
               194,269]
zones['z9'] = [24,298,302,274,66]
zones['z10'] = [111,74,135,103,142,23,206,250,243,309,48, 256, 88,49,308,217]
zones['z11'] = [214,297,38,101,47,226,317,280, 9,34]
zones['z12'] = [227,281,242,26,117,296,295,3,238,196,7,55,155,202, 75,190,229,176,219]
zones['z13'] = [4,5,246, 251,40,110,300,315,291,65,158,310, 209,67,201,100,211,20,266,140,157, 17,189,19,180,150,187,188,]
zones['z14'] = [53,258,245,164,174,290,299,210,314]
zones['z15'] = [116,191,212,30,41,216,32]
zones['z16'] = [8,152,181,1,113,283,64,45,197,199,257]

[dantravers]

Are they GSP, or GNodes? OR..? Looks like might help. Do you have the source of those, as might refer to them.

[dantravers]

Probably good stuff to talk to NG about, as they will be super attuned to constraint boundaries that are most important.. I wonder if we shoudl have added this to the list of possible enhancements to an extension.

[peterdudfield]

Further feedback

• Zonal information would be great as they almost map with the Constraint Boundaries.
• If it was possible to select multiple zones at once, that would be great

[peterdudfield]

This might also help - https://www.nationalgrideso.com/research-and-publications/electricity-ten-year-statement-etys/electricity-transmission-network/scottish-boundaries

[peterdudfield]

Might be a good idea to add the zones to the GSP location table, add dno tag to it aswell

[dantravers]

Jamie Taylor referenced teh same NGESO site as above.

[peterdudfield]

We had another customer feedback that they wanted this today. Reference that Z16 is very important

[dantravers]

John Walsh at NESO mentioned this also as being a desirable feature. See notes here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1LvnXr0AiFjqJZc_APSxFNpQhvwrshS14dh4VbVB_Ivw/edit#heading=h.xamv6pm0io47