codecov-commenter
commented
2 years ago Codecov Report
Base: 84.56% // Head: 83.81% // Decreases project coverage by -0.74% :warning:
Coverage data is based on head (
6c4e854) compared to base (c989e1b). Patch has no changes to coverable lines.:exclamation: Current head 6c4e854 differs from pull request most recent head 4bd0d1b. Consider uploading reports for the commit 4bd0d1b to get more accurate results
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## devel #1298 +/- ## ========================================== - Coverage 84.56% 83.81% -0.75% ========================================== Files 66 66 Lines 5499 5499 Branches 1257 1257 ========================================== - Hits 4650 4609 -41 - Misses 533 573 +40 - Partials 316 317 +1 ``` | [Impacted Files](https://codecov.io/gh/opencobra/cobrapy/pull/1298?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opencobra) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/cobra/util/process\_pool.py](https://codecov.io/gh/opencobra/cobrapy/pull/1298/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opencobra#diff-c3JjL2NvYnJhL3V0aWwvcHJvY2Vzc19wb29sLnB5) | `39.53% <0.00%> (-27.91%)` | :arrow_down: | | [src/cobra/sampling/optgp.py](https://codecov.io/gh/opencobra/cobrapy/pull/1298/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opencobra#diff-c3JjL2NvYnJhL3NhbXBsaW5nL29wdGdwLnB5) | `75.38% <0.00%> (-16.93%)` | :arrow_down: | | [src/cobra/sampling/core.py](https://codecov.io/gh/opencobra/cobrapy/pull/1298/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opencobra#diff-c3JjL2NvYnJhL3NhbXBsaW5nL2NvcmUucHk=) | `78.78% <0.00%> (-15.16%)` | :arrow_down: | | [src/cobra/flux\_analysis/deletion.py](https://codecov.io/gh/opencobra/cobrapy/pull/1298/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opencobra#diff-c3JjL2NvYnJhL2ZsdXhfYW5hbHlzaXMvZGVsZXRpb24ucHk=) | `82.45% <0.00%> (-7.02%)` | :arrow_down: | | [src/cobra/flux\_analysis/variability.py](https://codecov.io/gh/opencobra/cobrapy/pull/1298/diff?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opencobra#diff-c3JjL2NvYnJhL2ZsdXhfYW5hbHlzaXMvdmFyaWFiaWxpdHkucHk=) | `85.41% <0.00%> (-5.21%)` | :arrow_down: | Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us [how you rate us](https://about.codecov.io/nps?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opencobra). Have a feature suggestion? [Share it here.](https://app.codecov.io/gh/feedback/?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=opencobra):umbrella: View full report at Codecov.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.
cdiener
This modernizes some part of the doc building and fixes the RTD builds by switching to the new
.readthedocs.yamlwhich is required to pin a higher Python version (due to sympy needing Python >= 3.8). Also removes one TOC level for the API and adds type hints.One of the main issues was that the RTD webhook was deleted from the repo. I regenerated it, so the builds should trigger again also for the dev version.