Closed ngeiswei closed 2 years ago
Unlike regular deduction (as defined in the PLN book), full deduction does not assume
P(C|B,A) = P(C|B) P(C|¬B,A) = P(C|¬B)
This leads to a slightly more complex rule (even though it actually has less premises, those premises are more complex)
Implication <TV1> A B Implication <TV2> And A B C Implication <TV3> And A Not B C |- Implication <TV> A C
And the strength of the conclusion TV is
P(C|A) = P(C|B,A)×P(B|A) + P(C|¬B,A)×(1-P(B|A))
Note that in this PR
conditional-full-instantiation
has been renamed into
conditional-total-instantiation
because "total" is a better opposite word of "partial" than "full".
Unlike regular deduction (as defined in the PLN book), full deduction does not assume
This leads to a slightly more complex rule (even though it actually has less premises, those premises are more complex)
And the strength of the conclusion TV is