The following replace operation should be invalid since it is really a deletion operation.
Alternatively we allow treating it as a delete, but from the current spec it looks like it would be discouraged and I know of a vendor implementation that also errors out in this case.
The following replace operation should be invalid since it is really a deletion operation.
Alternatively we allow treating it as a delete, but from the current spec it looks like it would be discouraged and I know of a vendor implementation that also errors out in this case.