Open aw-bib opened 1 year ago
Shouldn't here another type added for: MPDL handling fees?
MPDL handling fees
IMHO explicitly mentioning MPDL
(= just some random company) would be a bit too German and too specific.
But indeed something along the line of payment fee
as we have it for individual articles sounds plausible.
As for the publshing
-> publish
: this is already implemented in the current schema. I think we sorted it out during a finalization where we cross checked all vocabulary terms to unify and align them. cf.
The current proposal for the the contracts schema we added several cost types associated with the contract as such. Currently we allow for
read
publishing
vat
I'd propose to rename
publishing
->publish
to be more in line with the other terms.Additionally, we need a new term for the fees in contracts with pure OA publishers (sometimes called
membership
, butmembership
is clearly the wrong word for a contract with a company).isRelatedTo: https://github.com/opencost-de/opencost/commit/c8124f4eadcf4b3d197a846604062d39995256a7