Closed CrystalAnalyst closed 10 months ago
@caoxianfei1 PTAL
cicheck
cicheck
@CrystalAnalyst need rebase otherwise ci may fail.
cicheck
cicheck
cicheck
@CrystalAnalyst please fix the conflict.
Use rebase
instead of merge
.
Also, it might be better to leave a blank line between the comment and the code.
Also, it might be better to leave a blank line between the comment and the code.
okay.
Use
rebase
instead ofmerge
.
yes, I reset to previous commit and use rebase solved the conflict justnow.
the commit message suggestion is: Feat/tool: add command recover volume
cicheck
cicheck
cicheck
LGTM!
cicheck
All checks have passed. Is there anyone who is authorized to help me merge this pull request ? @caoxianfei1 @montaguelhz @baytan0720 I'd appreciate that, thanks.
What problem does this PR solve?
Issue Number: #2588
Problem Summary: add recover as a middle command, and it has sub-command volume.
What is changed and how it works?
What's Changed: add recover middle command directory, and subcommand directory volume.
How it Works: recover.go is the middle command. Inside the sub-direcotry volume , the volume.go is the final command, while the recover.go wraps the RecoverFilePRC to execute the real recover procedure.
Side effects(Breaking backward compatibility? Performance regression?):
Check List