Closed sparrell closed 2 years ago
I propose this PR be discussed at next weekly PACE meeting
As the content is what was approved by the OCA PBG I don't have any suggested changes to it. I'm not sure it makes sense to bury this in a sub-folder of docs
, where it's likely to be the only file. It seems to me it should either be in the root folder or the docs
folder, but nothing deeper than that.
EDIT: it appears that links in the original project proposal document (e.g., to the SACM Architecture ID) were lost in conversion to Markdown.
@sparrell, yes, we should discuss. In fact, I'd like to make rolling through open PRs standard process for each weekly meeting, in addition to rolling through open issues/tickets.
@dlemire60, I like the charter being at the root level.
@dlemire60 - the PR has been modified to rename the file to PACE_charter.md and move it to the top directory.
Rename PACE_charter.md
to charter.md
copy charter from PDB email archives to make readily accessible