Closed michael-k closed 9 years ago
I'm ok with MIT, but also BSD if you want. Best would be to put this link in contributors: https://github.com/momorientes/metaEFA/graphs/contributors
BSD 2-clause, BSD 3-clause or ISC? http://choosealicense.com/licenses/ I think MIT has the advantage over “BSD” that it's clear which license is meant.
https://github.com/momorientes/metaEFA/graphs/contributors doesn't list @momorientes (author email not added to github account?) and @dansch94 (wiki only).
yes, @momorientes didn't add the used mail to his account => no contribution ("I don't care")
I still think the github contributors page is the best place to link to, because it fills/updates automatically. We can add a "doc contributors" list in the readme or so, to give credit to people that didn't contribute code.
Regarding LICENSE: I don't really care. I don't see the need for GPL or so and BSD, MIT, ISC, etc are very close to each other.
@momorientes @asmaps @c1ko @dansch94: License and contributors are still filled with the django boilerplate content. I'd vote in favor of deleting
CONTRIBUTORS.txt
, but what about the license? Should we stay with the MIT license (the copyright notice needs an update) or switch to another one?