Closed emmaai closed 10 months ago
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
b4a4eee
) 76.39% compared to head (1dc5369
) 76.41%. Report is 2 commits behind head on develop.
:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
I’ve tested but I’m not sure if it solved the issue or it didn’t hit the odd. So I wanna test it in a significant large scale in the coming summary products 2015 reprocessing test.
On Thu, 26 Oct 2023 at 11:11 am, Damien Ayers @.***> wrote:
@.**** approved this pull request.
Sure, give it a go.
Why do you need to commit the change to test it out though?
— Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/opendatacube/odc-stats/pull/101#pullrequestreview-1698539627, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABLBWNTRZIVJVUWF52CQXETYBGWUBAVCNFSM6AAAAAA6OYNKL6VHI2DSMVQWIX3LMV43YUDVNRWFEZLROVSXG5CSMV3GSZLXHMYTMOJYGUZTSNRSG4 . You are receiving this because you authored the thread.Message ID: @.***>
It's to test/address one of my theories on issue #100: the early unpack triggered something unexpected in dask graph.
My second theory is that the node id in dask graph is not unique when there are many chunks.