Closed DharmitD closed 1 year ago
cc @sutaakar @astefanutti
/lgtm
@gmfrasca / @amadhusu / @gregsheremeta can you also review/sign off on this
/lgtm
/lgtm
/hold until we figure out where to add this adr
this adr should have sufficient reviews/sign offs to accept it /lgtm /approve
@LaVLaS can we have this merged?
/hold
sorry, can we avoid reusing numbers?
ADR-xxxx already exists. Can we use ADR-DSP prefix?
(nitpick: would prefer we start at 1 too. My intention with 0 was for a meta-document, not an actual ADR)
/hold
sorry, can we avoid reusing numbers?
ADR-xxxx already exists. Can we use ADR-DSP prefix?
(nitpick: would prefer we start at 1 too. My intention with 0 was for a meta-document, not an actual ADR)
Makes sense. Updated the ADR title to have the ADR-DSP prefix and start at 1.
/hold
sorry, can we avoid reusing numbers?
ADR-xxxx already exists. Can we use ADR-DSP prefix?
(nitpick: would prefer we start at 1 too. My intention with 0 was for a meta-document, not an actual ADR)
Makes sense. Updated the ADR title to have the ADR-DSP prefix and start at 1.
/unhold
/approve
Description
ADR outlining the upgrade testing strategy for Data Science Pipelines. Resolves: #144
How Has This Been Tested?
Merge criteria: