Closed tarilabs closed 7 months ago
made some minor editorial comments, but I suggest rewording the whole document to reflect what is the model server component (present tense), instead of what is intended for the future.
thank you for the feedback @etirelli , I believe I rewritten all future tense sentences I could find to present tense with https://github.com/opendatahub-io/architecture-decision-records/pull/34/commits/4dd3c077b0813126372aa2044da47b7931cd6f31
Description
I followed same style per https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-3946
I've used as sources:
Since "Model Registry Tenancy Proposal" is still under finalization I didn't include it yet in the current PR, we can expand on it later once the ADR is approved.
How Has This Been Tested?
Merge criteria: