Closed atheo89 closed 1 month ago
/lgtm
would've been nice to see trivy again on this, but it's just backport, so I'm willing to believe
Yes, It would be nice to open a separated dummy PR and check everything. Since this is backport i will move to it
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED
Approval requirements bypassed by manually added approval.
This pull-request has been approved by: jstourac
The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.
The pull request process is described here
Thanks @jstourac, about the first point, it doesn't really need, since from the YYYYx branches we only build the notebooks, the difference comes in place on the manifest files on the rhoai x.y branches. About the second, yes since now we have already go to 0.6 let's keep an homogeneity and keep this consideration for future upgrades.
/override ci/prow/images
These images are failing because we don't have backport this https://github.com/opendatahub-io/notebooks/pull/570
@atheo89: Overrode contexts on behalf of atheo89: ci/prow/images
/override ci/prow/images These images are failing because we don't have backport this #570
I created this to track it https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-9801.
Since this is merged now, we need to not forget to update manifests together with the images updates in the rhoai-2.8 branch.
Related to: https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHOAIENG-6457
Description
This PR updates also the 2023a image version is order to get the vulnerability of PyArrow fixed on rhoai 2.8. This should flow to downstream 2023a and then update the manifests of rhoai2.8
Merge criteria: