chore: replace usage of fmt.Printf with logger

[lburgazzoli]

Description

How Has This Been Tested?

Screenshot or short clip

Merge criteria

• [x] You have read the contributors guide.
• [x] Commit messages are meaningful - have a clear and concise summary and detailed explanation of what was changed and why.
• [ ] Pull Request contains a description of the solution, a link to the JIRA issue, and to any dependent or related Pull Request.
• [ ] Testing instructions have been added in the PR body (for PRs involving changes that are not immediately obvious).
• [ ] The developer has manually tested the changes and verified that the changes work

[zdtsw]

/onhold just wait for you two to finalze discussion

[bartoszmajsak]

@lburgazzoli I was wondering the other day if carrying the logger through ctx would be a good approach long-term. WDYT?

[lburgazzoli]

@lburgazzoli I was wondering the other day if carrying the logger through ctx would be a good approach long-term. WDYT?

In the go community there are different opinion on the topic, but I think it makes sense. However, I would look into it (eventually) in a separate PR as it probably require some more intrusive changes.

[lburgazzoli]

/restest

[openshift-ci[bot]]

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: ykaliuta, zdtsw

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files: - ~~[OWNERS](https://github.com/opendatahub-io/opendatahub-operator/blob/incubation/OWNERS)~~ [ykaliuta,zdtsw] Approvers can indicate their approval by writing `/approve` in a comment Approvers can cancel approval by writing `/approve cancel` in a comment

[lburgazzoli]

/test opendatahub-operator-e2e

[lburgazzoli]

/retest