transmitter devices: update FLARM Atom

janusw commented 2 years ago

Some notes on the device which is currently listed as "Droniq Atom":

It's actually built by FLARM, Droniq is only selling it, so the name and link should probably be adjusted.
I had the opportunity to test this device a couple of months ago. There was actually no trace of Remote ID support whatsoever, despite the FLARM website saying otherwise. We contacted the manufacturer, and all we got were promises for the future. Until those promises are fulfilled (and someone can confirm it), I think it's only fair that it is listed as "no support" instead of "unconfirmed" (if only to counteract the overzealous marketing promises on their website).

gabrielcox commented 2 years ago

We should go back and see who added to get consensus. If there are no green checkmarks, then it probably should not qualify to be in this list at all.

janusw commented 2 years ago

We should go back and see who added to get consensus.

It was added by @friissoren in 616eaab5221199bd87857e26e661b85cfc0c74fd. There he added three devices (and I assume all simply based on the information on their websites, since they all contain question marks).

If there are no green checkmarks, then it probably should not qualify to be in this list at all.

Well, that's also fine, but I'd prefer to keep it like this, since it represents a stronger statement: They claim support for DRI, the device was tested, but does not work as advertised. (I hope it might work somewhere in the future, but unfortunately I don't know when that will be, since my crystal ball is currently broken.)

If we leave it out, it may also mean: No one is aware of that device yet, or no one tested it. Both is not true.

opendroneid / receiver-android

transmitter devices: update FLARM Atom #78