Replace Paver quality and js_test commands

[kdmccormick]

Context

Paver is deprecated:

• https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/issues/34467

We would like to fully remove it soon:

• https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/pull/34832

There are a small handful of Paver commands remaining in edx-platform. We need to replace these commands in order to fully remove Paver.

Tasks

## Tasks
- [x] Replace `paver run_pep8` with `pycodestyle`
- [x] Replace `paver run_eslint`
- [x] Replace `paver run_stylelint`
- [x] Replace `paver run_xsslint`
- [x] Replace `paver run_pii_check`
- [x] Replace `paver check_keywords`
- [x] Replace `paver test_js*` and `paver diff_coverage`

General Guidance

There is a "Commands" table on the Paver DEPR ticket. This covers all of the rows that say "Need to implement".

When choosing replacements: the best-case replacement is when we can simply run the underlying command. For example, I believe that pycodestyle will work out-of-the-box as a replacement for paver run_pep8. This is a very good developer experience, and it means that we don't need to maintain any custom tooling logic in edx-platform. It is possible that this will work for other commands, too, although some tooling configuration may need to be added in order for them to work.

The next-best-case is to have a simple Makefile target. For example, we might need to have make pii_check. If possible, try to avoid writing separate new scripts in edx-platform, as this increases complexity for end-users and adds new burden for edx-platform maintainers.

For each Paver command you replace:

• Update the GitHub action that uses it
• Remove the old Paver command. Paver is already deprecated, so there is no need to leave the old commands around for backwards-compatibility.
• Leave a note on https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/issues/34467 so that Kyle can update the table

Timeline

We would like to complete this before the Sumac cut in October so that Paver can be completely removed in the Sumac release.

[salman2013]

paver run_pep8

I tried thepycodestyle . command and its working fine, there is a scenario that i face where when i run this command on the terminal it was showing errors in few files but on CI it was not showing any error, after searching and reading i found there is version difference and the version of pycodestyle on my local machine was new which has some rules changes due to which it was complaining for in few file. Overall thispycodestyle . command is working fine.

paver run_stylelint

I tried stylelint command to replace the paver, it runs but gives me 10943 errors in all .scss files which are very hard to fix. If i use this command in CI the check will always fail. As per previous implementation there is a threshold count for violations and if that threshold crosses then they fail the check otherwise the errors are just stored in an external file. My thoughts are to go with the previous implementation logic and use a violation threshold.

paver run_eslint The same is the case with this command when i use the direct eslint command It gives a lot of errors in .js files which is hard to fix and to pass the CI check.

It's possible that the use of eslint and stylelint direct commands could cause an increase in errors if the rules have become stricter or if new rules have been added.

@kdmccormick @feanil I Need your feedback on this.

[kdmccormick]

@salman2013

pycodestyle -- great! As long as pycodestyle . passes when using the pycodestyle version pinned in testing.txt, then we are good.

stylelint and eslint -- good to know, thanks for checking that. I agree with your assessment that the existing violations would be hard to fix, so we will instead need a script to handle the threshhold. I imagine you can use a modified version of paver run_eslint and paver run_stylelint. Could you turn them into scripts under the scripts/ directory, and ensure that they don't use paver or any part of pavelib?

[salman2013]

PR link: https://github.com/openedx/edx-platform/pull/35159