codecov[bot]
commented
8 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
c614355) 92.36% compared to head (3691b8f) 92.36%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #621 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 92.36% 92.36% ======================================= Files 169 169 Lines 3445 3445 Branches 897 897 ======================================= Hits 3182 3182 Misses 243 243 Partials 20 20 ```:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
This PR contains the following updates:
4.1.2->4.2.1Release Notes
reduxjs/redux (redux)
### [`v4.2.1`](https://togithub.com/reduxjs/redux/releases/tag/v4.2.1) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/reduxjs/redux/compare/v4.2.0...v4.2.1) This bugfix release removes the `isMinified` internal check to fix a compat issue with Expo. That check has added [in early 2016, soon after Redux 3.0 was released](https://togithub.com/reduxjs/redux/issues/1029), at a time when it was still less common to use bundlers with proper production build settings. Today that check is irrelevant, so we've removed it. #### What's Changed - Remove minified check by [@trajano](https://togithub.com/trajano) in [https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/pull/4454](https://togithub.com/reduxjs/redux/pull/4454) **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/compare/v4.2.0...v4.2.1 ### [`v4.2.0`](https://togithub.com/reduxjs/redux/releases/tag/v4.2.0) [Compare Source](https://togithub.com/reduxjs/redux/compare/v4.1.2...v4.2.0) This release marks the original `createStore` API as `@deprecated` to encourage users to migrate to Redux Toolkit, and adds a new `legacy_createStore` API as an alias without the deprecation warning. #### Goal Redux Toolkit (the `@reduxjs/toolkit` package) is the right way for Redux users to write Redux code today: https://redux.js.org/introduction/why-rtk-is-redux-today Unfortunately, many tutorials are still showing legacy "hand-written" Redux patterns, which result in a much worse experience for users. New learners going through a bootcamp or an outdated Udemy course just follow the examples they're being shown, don't know that RTK is the better and recommended approach, and don't even think to look at our docs. Given that, the goal is to provide them with a visual indicator in their editor, like ~~createStore~~ . When users hover over the `createStore` import or function call, the doc tooltip recommends using `configureStore` from RTK instead, and points them to that docs page. We hope that new learners will see the strikethrough, read the tooltip, read the docs page, learn about RTK, and begin using it. To be *extremely* clear: **WE ARE *NOT* GOING TO ACTUALLY REMOVE THE `createStore` API, AND ALL YOUR EXISTING CODE WILL STILL CONTINUE TO WORK AS-IS!** We are just marking `createStore` as ["deprecated"](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deprecation#Software): > "the discouragement of use of some feature or practice, typically because it has been superseded or is no longer considered efficient or safe, without completely removing it or prohibiting its use" For additional details, see the extensive discussion in [https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/issues/4325](https://togithub.com/reduxjs/redux/issues/4325) . #### Rationale - RTK provides a vastly improved Redux usage experience, with APIs that simplify standard usage patterns and eliminate common bugs like accidental mutations - We've had suggestions to merge all of RTK into the `redux` core package, or fully deprecate the entire `redux` package and rename it to `@reduxjs/core`. Unfortunately, those bring up too many complexities: - We already had a package rename from `redux-starter-kit` to `@reduxjs/toolkit`, and all of our docs and tutorials have pointed to it for the last three years. I don't want to put users through another whiplash package transition for no real benefit - Merging or rearranging our packages would effectively require merging all of the Redux repos into a single monorepo. That would require hundreds of hours of effort from us maintainers, including needing to somehow merge all of our docs sites together. We don't have the time to do that. - I don't want to add *runtime* warnings that would be really annoying So, this is the minimum possible approach we can take to reach out to users who otherwise would never know that they are following outdated patterns, while avoiding breaking running user code or having to completely rewrite our package and repo structure. #### Results When a user imports `createStore` in their editor, they will see a visual strikethrough. Hovering over it will show a doc tooltip that encourages them to use `configureStore` from RTK, and points to an explanatory docs page:  Again, *no* broken code, and *no* runtime warnings. If users do not want to see that strikethrough, they have three options: - Follow our suggestion to switch over to Redux Toolkit and `configureStore` - Do nothing. It's just a visual strikethrough, and it doesn't affect how your code behaves. Ignore it. - Switch to using the `legacy_createStore` API that is now exported, which is the exact same function but with no `@deprecation` tag. The simplest option is to do an aliased import rename:  #### What's Changed - Mark `createStore` as deprecated, and add `legacy_createStore` alias by [@markerikson](https://togithub.com/markerikson) in [https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/pull/4336](https://togithub.com/reduxjs/redux/pull/4336) **Full Changelog**: https://github.com/reduxjs/redux/compare/v4.1.2...v4.2.0Configuration
📅 Schedule: Branch creation - "before 4am on Monday" in timezone America/New_York, Automerge - At any time (no schedule defined).
🚦 Automerge: Enabled.
♻ Rebasing: Whenever PR is behind base branch, or you tick the rebase/retry checkbox.
🔕 Ignore: Close this PR and you won't be reminded about this update again.
This PR has been generated by Mend Renovate. View repository job log here.