fix: replace Field.Email reference for Field.Text

[dcoa]

Description The master branch doesn't have the references to new Field.Text updated, there is a screenshot of the error

As well useGradeButtonData doesn't return a string in the label field is returning a function, so the numbers weren't render

This PR tries to solve that rendering situation.

What changed?

• Update the reference for Field.Email to Field.Text
• Update the test.

Developer Checklist

• [ ] Test suites passing
• [ ] Documentation and test plan updated, if applicable
• [ ] Received code-owner approving review
• [ ] Bumped version number package.json

Reviewer Checklist

Collectively, these should be completed by reviewers of this PR:

• [ ] I've done a visual code review
• [ ] I've tested the new functionality

FYI: @openedx/content-aurora

[openedx-webhooks]

Thanks for the pull request, @dcoa! Please note that it may take us up to several weeks or months to complete a review and merge your PR.

Feel free to add as much of the following information to the ticket as you can:

• supporting documentation
• Open edX discussion forum threads
• timeline information ("this must be merged by XX date", and why that is)
• partner information ("this is a course on edx.org")
• any other information that can help Product understand the context for the PR

All technical communication about the code itself will be done via the GitHub pull request interface. As a reminder, our process documentation is here.

Please let us know once your PR is ready for our review and all tests are green.

[codecov[bot]]

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (44197f6) 94.93% compared to head (e10ef6d) 94.93%.

Additional details and impacted files

```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #345 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 94.93% 94.93% ======================================= Files 139 139 Lines 1343 1343 Branches 264 264 ======================================= Hits 1275 1275 Misses 60 60 Partials 8 8 ``` | [Files Changed](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openedx/frontend-app-gradebook/pull/345?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [src/components/GradesView/GradebookTable/hooks.jsx](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openedx/frontend-app-gradebook/pull/345?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx#diff-c3JjL2NvbXBvbmVudHMvR3JhZGVzVmlldy9HcmFkZWJvb2tUYWJsZS9ob29rcy5qc3g=) | `100.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [...mponents/GradesView/GradebookTable/GradeButton.jsx](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openedx/frontend-app-gradebook/pull/345?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx#diff-c3JjL2NvbXBvbmVudHMvR3JhZGVzVmlldy9HcmFkZWJvb2tUYWJsZS9HcmFkZUJ1dHRvbi5qc3g=) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | |

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

[arslanashraf7]

Hey @mphilbrick211 we are facing the same issue while running the gradebook locally and on a server. Is it possible by any chance that the review on this PR could be prioritized?

[mphilbrick211]

Hey @mphilbrick211 we are facing the same issue while running the gradebook locally and on a server. Is it possible by any chance that the review on this PR could be prioritized?

Hi @openedx/content-aurora! Flagging this - would someone be able to please review?

[dcoa]

@muselesscreator @leangseu-edx

Hi folks, could you help us with a review in his PR or help us identify the right reviewer?

[dcoa]

Hi @arbrandes thank you for your review and not 100% sure to understand your request because when I used the branch I realized that the reason why the test didn't catch the errors was because the testing for this component and function was correct: Field.Text test and subsectionGrade test only the reference was not updated and not fail because of the use of jest.mock.

I updated the test reference too, or I just can think of using the original component instead of mocking it but that does not make the test fail only displays a console.error

[arbrandes]

Yeah, it might be going overboard to test for this retroactively, here. I feel like it would initiate a full revamp, which would probably be better planned elsewhere. (As part of the migration to react-testing-library, perhaps.) Let's just fix the glaring issue and move on, for now.

[openedx-webhooks]

@dcoa 🎉 Your pull request was merged! Please take a moment to answer a two question survey so we can improve your experience in the future.