openedx / xblock-lti-consumer

GNU Affero General Public License v3.0
28 stars 84 forks source link

fix: lms compatibility with descriptor->block rename #370

Closed zacharis278 closed 1 year ago

zacharis278 commented 1 year ago

MST-1898

Fixes compatibility issue with recent LMS changes to refactor item/module/block/descriptor terminology.

codecov[bot] commented 1 year ago

Codecov Report

Patch coverage: 100.00% and no project coverage change.

Comparison is base (61fb278) 97.73% compared to head (dc7dcce) 97.73%.

Additional details and impacted files ```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #370 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.73% 97.73% ======================================= Files 77 77 Lines 6321 6321 ======================================= Hits 6178 6178 Misses 143 143 ``` | Flag | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | unittests | `97.73% <100.00%> (ø)` | | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more. | [Impacted Files](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openedx/xblock-lti-consumer/pull/370?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [lti\_consumer/plugin/compat.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openedx/xblock-lti-consumer/pull/370?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx#diff-bHRpX2NvbnN1bWVyL3BsdWdpbi9jb21wYXQucHk=) | `60.00% <ø> (ø)` | | | [lti\_consumer/\_\_init\_\_.py](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openedx/xblock-lti-consumer/pull/370?src=pr&el=tree&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx#diff-bHRpX2NvbnN1bWVyL19faW5pdF9fLnB5) | `100.00% <100.00%> (ø)` | |

:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Do you have feedback about the report comment? Let us know in this issue.