codecov[bot]
commented
7 months ago Codecov Report
All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests :white_check_mark:
Comparison is base (
44d0126) 97.84% compared to head (58f9485) 97.85%.
Additional details and impacted files
```diff @@ Coverage Diff @@ ## master #439 +/- ## ======================================= Coverage 97.84% 97.85% ======================================= Files 77 77 Lines 6696 6701 +5 ======================================= + Hits 6552 6557 +5 Misses 144 144 ``` | [Flag](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openedx/xblock-lti-consumer/pull/439/flags?src=pr&el=flags&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx) | Coverage Δ | | |---|---|---| | [unittests](https://app.codecov.io/gh/openedx/xblock-lti-consumer/pull/439/flags?src=pr&el=flag&utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx) | `97.85% <100.00%> (+<0.01%)` | :arrow_up: | Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. [Click here](https://docs.codecov.io/docs/carryforward-flags?utm_medium=referral&utm_source=github&utm_content=comment&utm_campaign=pr+comments&utm_term=openedx#carryforward-flags-in-the-pull-request-comment) to find out more.:umbrella: View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
:loudspeaker: Have feedback on the report? Share it here.
We're seeing some unexpectedly slow execution on launch endpoints. These trace statements will allow us to profile these functions specifically in New Relic.