Expected Behavior:
Each load in the "status2023" scenario should have valid time series data that can be used for further analysis and simulation.
Actual Behavior:
Some loads within the scenario are associated with time series that are entirely NaN, rendering them unusable for any practical purpose. In my case 17 central_heat and rural_heat loads are affected.
Suggested Actions:
@CarlosEpia or @ClaraBuettner could you check if this is also the case in the "status2019" scenario?
A review of the data ingestion and processing pipeline for the "status2023" scenario might be necessary to identify and rectify the root cause of this issue.
eTraGo should maybe check if all time series are valid and if all components have time series in the consistency check
Expected Behavior: Each load in the "status2023" scenario should have valid time series data that can be used for further analysis and simulation.
Actual Behavior: Some loads within the scenario are associated with time series that are entirely NaN, rendering them unusable for any practical purpose. In my case 17
central_heat
andrural_heat
loads are affected.Suggested Actions: