Closed kristsaet closed 1 month ago
This I was not able to reproduce on a random model (see image below). I tried to create two prismatic joints on a simple shell part and they both looks OK to me. Or do you mean placing two prismatics on the same location (only with the slave triad a different place)? In that case it is intended the two prismatics will share the same glider when they both are attached to the FE part.
@kristsaet You need to describe this issue more accurately before it can be addressed further.
I failed to inform that I am using system-level beam elements, and also the "Prismatic Joint between triads" method of creating the joint.
Attaching demo-models in zip-file before and after adding the joints.
If you open the model named _1_Prism.fmm and select triad 13 and 3 as masters for the new joint, and triad 8 for slave, this bug should trigger I believe.
In the model named _2_Prism.fmm the second joint is already wrongly modelled.
The second prismatic joint modeled get the same master-segment curve as the first prismatic. And joint is corrupt. Has to be manually handled by editing the FMM file, and adding the second master-line manually.