Searching for "nbJ" only brings up the parameter TP_nbj in impot_revenu.credits_impot.ppe.
However, searching for "Nombre d'enfants majeurs célibataires sans enfant" brings up two results, nbJ and nombre_enfants_majeurs_celibataires_sans_enfant, respectively defined on entities FoyerFiscal and Menage.
Given that a variable named X exists, I would expect that searching for the exact text X will bring up variable X, for all values of X.
I hit this while debugging one of the generated tax tests, I was trying to understand the input variables and entered nbJ in search to see what it was, and quite taken aback when it didn't show up - I started assuming that the branch of France I was on had defined new variables compared to master and wasted a bit of time falsifying that assumption.
I have little idea what's special about nbJ. It doesn't seem to have to do with the case of the J. I don't see how it could have to do with the length of the search string, given that you can search for "cf" and have cf come up.
The only hypothesis I can come up with is that it's because nbJ and nombre_enfants_majeurs_celibataires_sans_enfant have the exact same description "Nombre d'enfants majeurs célibataires sans enfant", and this somehow messes up indexing. I can test this sometime next week, unless someone wants to look into it first.
Searching for "nbJ" only brings up the parameter
TP_nbj
inimpot_revenu.credits_impot.ppe
.However, searching for "Nombre d'enfants majeurs célibataires sans enfant" brings up two results,
nbJ
andnombre_enfants_majeurs_celibataires_sans_enfant
, respectively defined on entitiesFoyerFiscal
andMenage
.Given that a variable named
X
exists, I would expect that searching for the exact textX
will bring up variableX
, for all values ofX
.I hit this while debugging one of the generated tax tests, I was trying to understand the input variables and entered
nbJ
in search to see what it was, and quite taken aback when it didn't show up - I started assuming that the branch of France I was on had defined new variables compared to master and wasted a bit of time falsifying that assumption.I have little idea what's special about nbJ. It doesn't seem to have to do with the case of the J. I don't see how it could have to do with the length of the search string, given that you can search for "cf" and have
cf
come up.The only hypothesis I can come up with is that it's because
nbJ
andnombre_enfants_majeurs_celibataires_sans_enfant
have the exact same description "Nombre d'enfants majeurs célibataires sans enfant", and this somehow messes up indexing. I can test this sometime next week, unless someone wants to look into it first.