Open CharlesNepote opened 1 year ago
@CharlesNepote, is it done?
I guess this is not done yet. I have just modified this olive oil, but it's still Nutri-Score D and without data quality error: https://world.openfoodfacts.org/product/001682/minotaur-bio-huile-d-olive-vierge-extra Maybe @stephanegigandet has to launch taxonomy deployment or some task I don't know of.
DQ errors are there now @CharlesNepote
Yes. For the record:
Also added to: https://wiki.openfoodfacts.org/List_of_data_quality_errors_(generated)
Before closing I'm going to open another issue to gather more products with only one ingredient, and/or product categories which should have only one Nutri-Score.
This issue has been open 90 days with no activity. Can you give it a little love by linking it to a parent issue, adding relevant labels and projets, creating a mockup if applicable, adding code pointers from https://github.com/openfoodfacts/openfoodfacts-server/blob/main/.github/labeler.yml, giving it a priority, editing the original issue to have a more comprehensive description… Thank you very much for your contribution to 🍊 Open Food Facts
@CharlesNepote, is there anything else to do with this issue?
Stats for 2024-09-02:
In most case this is due to olive oil which should always contain only "olive oil" but which often countain "olive oil manually blah blah blah".
Should en:ingredients-single-ingredient-from-category-does-not-match-actual-ingredients be an error or a warning?
The Nutri-Score of some categories is predictable. Eg:
If an extra-virgin olive oils is not Nutri-Score C, then:
In both cases, it's an error, there can't be false positives. It should lead to a data-quality-error, and not just a warning.
It probably represent thousands of products. For example, as of today (2023-04), 677 olive oils have a Nutri-Score different from C.
To let it scale, I would be in favor to add this data in the taxonomy. Eg. (look at the last line):
Part of
5517
5538