Closed mattwthompson closed 1 year ago
Check out this pull request on
See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.
Powered by ReviewNB
Merging #1671 (36dbcfb) into main (e87add9) will increase coverage by
0.01%
. Report is 4 commits behind head on main. The diff coverage isn/a
.:exclamation: Current head 36dbcfb differs from pull request most recent head 366d4fb. Consider uploading reports for the commit 366d4fb to get more accurate results
All of the notebooks tracked in the repo were run with access to OpenEye, which most of our users don't also have. This leads to some reasonable confusion (#1668). For context, the centralized examples are currently rendered without OpenEye.
This also uncovered a couple of cobwebs, like some deprecation warnings that are no longer relevant, with some of these notebooks not run for a couple of years.
This would also be a good time to switch notebooks over to Sage 2.1.0 - I'm just opening this as-is to keep it a bit smaller.