Closed bannanc closed 7 years ago
I totally agree with this, @bannanc and I agree with your estimates; they seem reasonable given the GAFF values and, since this is to maximize coverage with as few parameters as possible, this looks like a good starting point. More specialization can come later when/if the data drives it.
Please start a document indicating prioritized chemistry to look at this summer. Obviously this should be one such region of chemical space.
added in pull request #43
This is the first, of I'm sure will be many issues for parameter types that are simply non-existent in the parm@Frosst universe. We would like to get more complete coverage in the force field first then may follow-up later with QM calculations.
Single sulfur phosphorous bonds are not in the parm@Frosst universe.
Here are the relevant bonds I was able to find in GAFF2
Relevant phosphorous types
Relevant sulfur types
The
*x
and*y
types seem to be fairly specialized so I suggest we use k = 150 r = 2.1 for now with the SMIRKS [#15:1]-[#16:2] and the "rough estimate from GAFF2 by CCB on [date]"