Closed bannanc closed 7 years ago
The molecules with these groups didn't make it to our gaff2 mol2 files for some reason.
I suggest we update the nitro angle from:
[#6:1]-[#7X3:2](~[#8X1])~[#8X1:3] 70.000 117.700 Frosst CA-N2-O2 from fit to rhf/6-31G* from T.Halgren 1/26/99
to
[#6,#7,#8:1]-[#7X3:2](~[#8X1])~[#8X1:3] 70.000 117.700 Frosst CA-N2-O2 from fit to rhf/6-31G* from T.Halgren 1/26/99
This is a very specific angle and from what I can tell it doesn't change any of the other nitrogen centered angles.
@bannanc - this seems reasonable to me, though with a prioritization for QM follow-up (e.g. the summer student should pull some molecules and look at whether this angle should be treated separately for [#6]
, [#7]
, and [#8]
, probably.
Added in pull request #43
There is only one angle still being assigned the generic in the filtered drugbank set, it looks like a nitro group, but the nitrogen is bound to three oxygens the third is divalent. Like the molecule below:
I've been trying to think through what is "right" for this angle. We draw nitro groups with a neutral and negative oxygen, but really I would think of the
#8X1
oxygens as being equivalent, which means the angle to the "other oxygen" should more closely resemble the C-N-O angle in "normal" nitro groups.I'm going to see how those numbers compare in gaff right now...