Open mrshirts opened 3 years ago
So, AMBER electrostatics assume a slightly old definition of the dielectric constant. Does this need to be specified as well?
See https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10822-016-9977-1 for a discussion of the issue and the differences between different programs.
One can sort of work around it since AMBER .prmtop actually defines the charges as sqrt(vacuum dielectric constant)*charge, so one can alter the charge here to give the same electrostatic energy as in another system.
Bumping the questions if the dielectric constant needs to be defined.
So, AMBER electrostatics assume a slightly old definition of the dielectric constant. Does this need to be specified as well?
See https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007%2Fs10822-016-9977-1 for a discussion of the issue and the differences between different programs.
One can sort of work around it since AMBER .prmtop actually defines the charges as sqrt(vacuum dielectric constant)*charge, so one can alter the charge here to give the same electrostatic energy as in another system.