glm regression - re generating bleeding libs will *probably* fix

[dimitre]

Hey @danoli3 I think it worth to manually trigger bleeding releases again glm 0.9.9.9 had some strange issues, now it seems to be fixed in 1.0.0 as the formula is pointing to master it is only a matter of re-generating ( I think ) Thanks

[danoli3]

Roger firing on upstream

[danoli3]

Oh its actually already targeting master so its should be fine and already at 1.0.0.

# tools for git use
GIT_URL=https://github.com/g-truc/glm
GIT_TAG=master

[danoli3]

Building now should be live within the hour across all platforms @dimitre

[dimitre]

Thanks @danoli3 it is unfortunate a regression still present in 1.0.0 I had to revert back to 0.9.9.8 to make things work here.

[ofTheo]

@dimitre I’m curious what the 0.9.9 and 1.0.0 issues are?

[dimitre]

1.0.0

In file included from /Volumes/tool/ofw/apps/werkApps/ScenesPBR2/src/ofApp.cpp:1:
In file included from src/ofApp.h:6:
In file included from /Volumes/tool/ofw/addons/ofxMicroUI/src/ofxMicroUI.h:20:
In file included from ../../../libs/openFrameworks/graphics/ofImage.h:3:
In file included from ../../../libs/openFrameworks/gl/ofTexture.h:3:
In file included from ../../../libs/openFrameworks/graphics/ofGraphicsBaseTypes.h:3:
In file included from ../../../libs/openFrameworks/types/ofColor.h:5:
In file included from ../../../libs/glm/include/glm/gtx/wrap.hpp:16:
In file included from ../../../libs/glm/include/glm/gtx/../glm.hpp:118:
In file included from ../../../libs/glm/include/glm/gtx/../vec3.hpp:5:
In file included from ../../../libs/glm/include/glm/gtx/.././ext/vector_bool3.hpp:5:
In file included from ../../../libs/glm/include/glm/gtx/.././ext/../detail/type_vec3.hpp:446:
In file included from ../../../libs/glm/include/glm/gtx/../detail/type_vec3.inl:834:
../../../libs/glm/include/glm/gtx/../detail/type_vec_simd.inl:924:30: error: template argument for non-type template parameter must be an expression
                        return !compute_vec_equal<float, Q, false, 32, true>::call(v1, v2);

[dimitre]

nevermind @ofTheo @danoli3 I was using an unpopular define in this particular project

define GLM_FORCE_NEON

it works well with 1.0.0

[ofTheo]

ahh okay - awesome! 👍

[danoli3]

Looking at the repo more, surely we should just compile this here