"$comment": "[RL] 3x CS subtypes missing."
"$comment": "[RL] For CS subtypes, 19111/Topic 2 has constraints on (i) dimension [number of axes] permitted (for each subtype), (ii) data type for axis unit (for several subtypes). The above enumeration and schema for 'axis' does not include these constraints."
"$comment": "[RL] 19111/Topic 2 (and WKT2) has constraints on the type of CS that may be associated with each subtype of CRS. Not clear that the above enumeration allows for these constraints: should each CS subtype be defined?"
NOTE: Markdown does not support highlighting in color, so bold/italic has been used to highlight the material being discussed. This issue is extracted from the document submitted by Roger Lott at https://github.com/opengeospatial/CRS-JSON-Encoding/blob/main/ProjJson%20v0-7%20RL%202024-06-16.docx for discussion at the CRS SWG meeting OGC held during the Montreal June 2024 TC meeting.
"polar", "linear", "cylindrical",
"$comment": "[RL] 3x CS subtypes missing." "$comment": "[RL] For CS subtypes, 19111/Topic 2 has constraints on (i) dimension [number of axes] permitted (for each subtype), (ii) data type for axis unit (for several subtypes). The above enumeration and schema for 'axis' does not include these constraints." "$comment": "[RL] 19111/Topic 2 (and WKT2) has constraints on the type of CS that may be associated with each subtype of CRS. Not clear that the above enumeration allows for these constraints: should each CS subtype be defined?"