Closed TatjanaKutzner closed 1 year ago
In the web meeting on 8 July we discussed that it would be fine to rename the xsd cityGMLBase.xsd
to core.xsd
.
In addition, we also discussed that it will be useful to provide a profile schema file that imports all CityGML modules. This profile file already exists for CityGML 2.0 (http://schemas.opengis.net/citygml/profiles/base/2.0/CityGML.xsd) and should also be provided for CityGML 3.0.
Both, renaming of cityGMLBase.xsd
to core.xsd
and providing a profile file (name: CityGML.xsd
) was applied in commit b35e09d80cb4be2c24698c1440ebdbd8edba1538
Issue will be closed, renaming has been done long time ago.
Is there a reason, why the XSD file of the
Core
module has been namedcityGMLBase.xsd
in CityGML 2.0?I would find it more intuitive to name the file
core.xsd
in CityGML 3.0. Also all other XSDs are named according to the module name.