search

opengeospatial / CoverageJSON

Public repo for CoverageJSON project
Apache License 2.0
10 stars 8 forks source link

Several clarifications to the text requested - 8 #111

Closed chris-little closed 2 years ago

chris-little commented 2 years ago

@joanma747 identified several areas of confusion requiring improvements to the text. These have been split into 8 separate sub-issues:

  1. The document could benefit from some class diagram in UML. This will make the similarities and differences with CIS more visible and clear the path to a possible convergence in the future.
chris-little commented 2 years ago

@joanma747 We could add a UML class diagram as future work. or if we do it now, we need someone with a diagramming tool.

chris-little commented 2 years ago

@joanma747 We agreed at CoverageJSON Task Team 2022-07-13 to postpone any UML diagram to future work on a conceptual model, as part of the comparison work. Adding definitions of the domain and range to the document may have helped too.