Closed jonblower closed 1 year ago
Apologies for the conflicts - I should probably have cancelled the previous PR first, or based this PR on the current master branch
The intention was actually to keep the "Illustrative Example" heading as I thought this looked logical as a sub-heading in parallel with the UML diagram. I think it helps people browsing the TOC, otherwise the "Introduction" section is quite long. I don't feel strongly though if you think otherwise.
@jonblower apologies - I thought the conflict was the original Example
title. Happy to put in again
Added the UML conceptual diagram as per #21.
On reflection, and slightly different to what we agreed in the telecon, I thought it was worth keeping "Illustrative Example" as a heading at the same level as the UML diagram, so we should end up with:
which seems to make sense to me from the point of view of someone browsing the TOC. So this would effectively cancel out the previous PR. Does that make sense to you, @chris-little?