Closed chris-little closed 2 years ago
Comments are being addressed in this repo by the CoverageJSON Task Team under the auspices of the Coverage SWG.
Work to tighten up the specification, without substantially changing it, is being developed by the originators.
A schema, with helpful error messages, has been 85% developed to ensure formal testing can be performed.
A detailed comparision with other Coverage payload formats, such as GeoTIFF and CIS JSON, is starting to identify future developments of CoverageJSON within the OGC SWG framework with a target of convergence with OGC Coverages definitions.
There is currently no evidence that CoverageJSON deviates significantly from the ISO19123 abstract standard.
CoverageJSON Task Team 2022-02-09 agreed issue addressed.
"While [this OGC Member] does not have sufficient knowledge of coverage standards considerations to vote yes or no, we recognize the substantial number of comments that have been put forward voicing concern with the proposed work item. We strongly encourage work item submitters to work with OGC and commenters to resolve these concerns."