search

opengeospatial / CoverageJSON

Public repo for CoverageJSON project
Apache License 2.0
10 stars 8 forks source link

Vote Comment - 6 More standardized approach #42

Closed chris-little closed 2 years ago

chris-little commented 2 years ago

"I would prefer a more standardized approach toward a proper Coverage CIS eventually in json."

chris-little commented 2 years ago

Comments are being addressed in this repo by the CoverageJSON Task Team under the auspices of the Coverage SWG. The Task Team regularly meets adjacent to the CoverageSWG on Wednesdays.

A schema has been developed to ensure formal testing can be performed.

A detailed comparision with other Coverage payload formats, such as GeoTIFF and CIS JSON, has started, in this repo, with the Coverages SWG, to identify future developments of CoverageJSON within the OGC SWG framework with a target of convergence with OGC Coverages definitions.

chris-little commented 2 years ago

The publication of a Community Standard by OGC has a formal, standardised process, which has been rigorously followed.

chris-little commented 2 years ago

Some of the encountered issues highlight the confusion over conceptual aspects of Abstract Topic 6 / ISO 19123 (conceptual) standard versus the logical model and the physical CIS JSON encoding defined in the CIS standard.

This clarification issue is being addressed by the Coverages SWG . Please see this issue.

CoverageJSON Task Team 2022-02-09 agreed issue of discussion on the conformance issue with current OGC standards/implementations has been addressed.