search

opengeospatial / CoverageJSON

Public repo for CoverageJSON project
Apache License 2.0
10 stars 8 forks source link

Should Annex A be removed? #78

Closed ghobona closed 2 years ago

ghobona commented 2 years ago

Annex A appears to be unused.

Screenshot 2022-05-20 at 14 19 48

Should it be removed?

If Annex A is removed, then Clause 2 (Conformance) has to be updated accordingly.

chris-little commented 2 years ago

@ghobona We were not sure how to use Annex A. There is a JSON Schema bundle, now part of the spec, which has also been incorporated into the CoverageJSON sandbox which can test files for conformance. We could also insert text pointing to the schema in its orginal place, and suggesting the sandbox/playground, as well as highlighting the Cookbook. I think Scott had said pointing to the community schema would be acceptable. @jonblower @letmaik for info and suggestions

chris-little commented 2 years ago

@ghobona @jonblower We could remove Annex A and then add similar to the above text to Chapter 2. The only conformance class is that a CoverageJSON object is a valid JSON object and conforms to the CoverageJSON schema. I think I prefer this approach. We can discuss in the Task Team meeting today Wednesday 25 May 2022 at 14:00 UTC (15:00 BST, 10:00 EDT)

chris-little commented 2 years ago

@ghobona PR #83 removes Annex A and updates Chapter 2

chris-little commented 2 years ago

@ghobona Are you happy for this PR #83 to be merged?

chris-little commented 2 years ago

Fixed by merge of PR#83.