Closed dblodgett-usgs closed 7 years ago
The response to issues raised by this review can be summarized into the following: Goal 1) In response to a number of comments, we want to make sure that our hydrology-domain model has all the needed features and relationships to allow definition of a complete mathematical-topology so we can eliminate the topology-related tagged values without limiting the utility of the model to future topological projects.
Goal 2) Clarify the usage of the term outfall with a goal of not using the term to describe the concept it attempts to model in HY_Features.
Goal 3) Ensure that linear referencing is still in line with the ISO standard, works for hydrology, and does not use tagged values to document its construction.
All issues have been documented.
Also addressed by #188, #189, #190, #191, #192, #193, #194, and #196.
Once all the issues embedded in here have been opened elsewhere, this can be closed.
HY_FeaturesV0.10-critique-Sondheim&Martin2017Feb16.pdf