Closed dblodgett-usgs closed 7 years ago
@IrinaDornblut - Are you ok with making this change? We've talked about it in person and in email and I want to be sure you are OK removing it.
Happy with that.
On 15 May 2017 4:31 AM, "David Blodgett" notifications@github.com wrote:
@IrinaDornblut https://github.com/irinadornblut - Are you ok with making this change? We've talked about it in person and in email and I want to be sure you are OK removing it.
— You are receiving this because you are subscribed to this thread. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/opengeospatial/HY_Features/issues/222#issuecomment-301330856, or mute the thread https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/AIR3YVDfDvNd-YvC1OiSKv4zn4QNOyjEks5r50iNgaJpZM4NTLeG .
Suggestion from @IrinaDornblut that we keep figure 16, remove figure 20, and adjust text to illustrate that this case is possible but not a common implementation. I think this is a good solution as it shows that our model CAN align with the ISO model, but emphasizes the common implementation in hydrology is relative to a catchment outlet (or inlet).
I go this taken care of in section 6.6.
I think we should remove this from the spec. I don't see the need for linear referencing except along whole flowpaths where the measurement is in reference to a known inlet or outlet.