Closed marqh closed 2 years ago
In progress - I will set up the new entailment regime to add the necessary metadata to these terms so the UI can find them and render them.
This took a while - finally got to the stage where safe to publish to production using the automation scripts.
hello Naming Authority
87 addressed some issues of missing content for the Binary Array linked data vocabulary
(thank you)
in running some tests, it has become apparent that this is only a partial fix
The `owl:Class' instances such as:
owl:DatatypeProperty
, e.g.:owl:ObjectProperty
, e.g.:are returning
which means that tests expecting a 200 code to indicate known publishing of these terms are returning failure
What is different about these different types that means that some entities within the ontology are being published as known resources and others are not (seemingly based on the resource type definition)?
Is this something that can be fixed for us?
many thanks mark