Register minimal SELFIE ontologies as "experimental"?

[dblodgett-usgs]

@sgrellet opened: https://github.com/opengeospatial/SELFIE/issues/67 asking about how to get IE-created resources published as "experimental".

The current HY_Features content is deployed as "proposed", (e.g. here) which is accurate since the SWG proposed the content. In this next round, we have not worked directly with the SWGs, yet.

Should we 1) work with SWGs and have the ontologies route through them? or 2) can the updated ontologies from SELFIE be posted as "experimental"?

Thanks!!

[ghobona]

The preferred route is (1). An e-mail vote or portal project vote within the SWG/DWG would suffice. This can be done ahead of a TC meeting or during the next TC meeting.

[dblodgett-usgs]

Thanks @ghobona -- we'll initiate email votes to deploy these as "proposed" as we want to evaluate them prior to saying this is totally firm. That seem ok?

[ghobona]

Yes, that's fine. Thanks.

[ghobona]

Some recent examples of motions.

Please see Slide 5 of the Closing Report of the NetCDF SWG (Banff TC) for an example of an appropriate motion

https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=90206

Please see Slide 7 of the Closing Report of the LandInfra DWG/SWG (Banff TC) for another example of appropriate motion

https://portal.opengeospatial.org/files/?artifact_id=90130

[dblodgett-usgs]

@ghobona and @rob-metalinkage's -- based on recent comments in https://github.com/opengeospatial/SELFIE/issues/67, should we consider "experimental" on defs-dev or go ahead and pursue a motion?

[ghobona]

@dblodgett-usgs Ok, please proceed with "experimental". Then when the ontology is completed, please submit the ontology to the SWG/DWG for approval.

[dblodgett-usgs]

OK. Thanks. Will Do.