Open KathiSchleidt opened 3 months ago
Thanks @KathiSchleidt .
Some of the triples appear to be from version 2.0 of O&M.
It also appears some of the URIs are simply lowercase versions of their Camel Case equivalents. Notice the sameAs relationships between them.
https://github.com/opengeospatial/NamingAuthority/blob/master/definitions/conceptschemes/om.ttl#L74
We will need the OMS SWG to pass a Motion stating which triples should be marked as invalid.
The SWG should then create a Pull Request listing the triples to be removed at https://github.com/opengeospatial/NamingAuthority/blob/master/incubation/ObservationTypes/removal_list.csv
Invalid or simply deprecated/retired/superseded, and we can then both 1) hide them from the concept hierarchies, and 2) redirect their URLs to the RAINBOW views of the valid concepts.
We can also explore some widget logic to deal with this - but we need guidance from the SWG as to what the preferred form is before it can be marked as such and alternatives suppressed.
When one look at the definition for OGC observationType, one gets a long list of both observationTypes as well as samplingFeatureTypes, whereby each concept is provided in quadruplicate!
For each entry of both observationType as well as samplingFeatureType, we have 4 base URIs. For observationType: http://www.opengis.net/def/observationType/OGC-OM/2.0/OM_CategoryObservation http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc-om/OM_CategoryObservation http://www.opengis.net/def/observation-type/ogc-om/2.0/om_category-observation http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc-om/om_category-observation
For samplingFeatureType: http://www.opengis.net/def/samplingFeatureType/OGC-OM/2.0/SF_SpatialSamplingFeature http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc-om/sf_spatial-sampling-feature http://www.opengis.net/def/sampling-feature-type/ogc-om/2.0/sf_spatial-sampling-feature http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc-om/SF_SpatialSamplingFeature
Details here
Related to #279