Ready for OGC-NA Review: OGC Points of Interest (POI) Standards

[ghobona]

OGC-NA,

The following document(s) titled are now available for review by the OGC Naming Authority (OGC-NA) Subcommittee.

OGC Points of Interest (POI) Conceptual Model Standard

https://docs.ogc.org/DRAFTS/21-049.html

OGC Points of Interest Part 2: JSON Encoding Standard

https://docs.ogc.org/DRAFTS/23-045.html

Please review the documents by 22:00 UTC on May 4, 2024 focusing on its conformance to OGC-NA policies.

OGC-NA policies can be found at https://www.ogc.org/standards/na

The most relevant policies are:

• OGC-NA Name type specification - definitions (09-048r6)
• OGC-NA Name type specification - specification elements (10-103r1)

Let us know before then if there are any comments or objections to unanimous consent to its approval by the OGC-NA.

Regards,

OGC Staff

[ghobona]

Conceptual Model

Clause 5.1 (Conventions) uses uppercase as in http://www.opengis.net/spec/POI

However, the coverpage and the ATS use lowercase poi.

Clause 5.1 should be changed to use lowercase poi i.e. http://www.opengis.net/spec/poi

[ghobona]

On the Conceptual Model candidate standard, Requirement 20 and Requirement 23 have the same URI /req/core/poi-payload

[ghobona]

On the Conceptual Model candidate standard, Abstract Test A.9 references a non-existing requirement /req/core/abstractfeature-creationdate

[ghobona]

Issues addressed by Pull Request https://github.com/opengeospatial/poi/pull/144

[ghobona]

Review completed.

Cc: @cmheazel