Closed ghobona closed 4 years ago
@pebau @dr-shorthair @rob-metalinkage
Do you know if the GML definitions of the coordinate systems listed above were ever documented?
I don't recall seeing any of those.
@ghobona This is the original submission package, although I cannot find it in the OGC-NA folder of the portal. Most of the definitions in this package are still working, but not the ones in the 'crs' and 'cs' branches.
Gobe- no, I cannot remember having seen that on the table. Upon directive by NA we can add it on short notice, though. We just need to correct a broken link to the resolver (Kevin is informed). -Peter
On 18.05.20 08:48, ghobona wrote:
@pebau https://github.com/pebau @dr-shorthair https://github.com/dr-shorthair @rob-metalinkage https://github.com/rob-metalinkage
Do you know if the GML definitions of the coordinate systems listed above were ever documented?
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/opengeospatial/NamingAuthority/issues/47#issuecomment-629980896, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOR5DRVMTFW4YICEGUOV6TRSDK4BANCNFSM4NDZFRIQ.
-- Dr. Peter Baumann
@ghobona, @dr-shorthair, @pebau I would like to clarify that these were registered back in 2011, and were once available from the OGC register, as shown by the bottom links that still work:
http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/NED http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ENU http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI_GCRF http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI_J2000 http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI_M50
However, these aliases point to the original URIs and definitions (exactMatch) that are not available anymore.
FYI, the OGC resolver redirection is broken currently. On May 16 Kevin was informed (putting him on cc here). Let me point out, though, that additionally the URLs below do not comply with standard OGC syntax which should rather be http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/NED Let me suggest that
-Peter
On 19.05.20 06:36, Alex Robin wrote:
@ghobona https://github.com/ghobona, @dr-shorthair https://github.com/dr-shorthair, @pebau https://github.com/pebau I would like to clarify that these were registered back in 2011, and were once available from the OGC register, as shown by the bottom links that still work:
http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/NED http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ENU http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI_GCRF http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI_J2000 http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI_M50
However, these aliases point to the original URIs and definitions that are not available anymore.
— You are receiving this because you were mentioned. Reply to this email directly, view it on GitHub https://github.com/opengeospatial/NamingAuthority/issues/47#issuecomment-630574152, or unsubscribe https://github.com/notifications/unsubscribe-auth/ABOR5DTW7MNZDAMRVUWGS33RSIEFVANCNFSM4NDZFRIQ.
-- Dr. Peter Baumann
@pebau I guess I wasn't clear in my last comment, but actually the definitions that were originally submitted back in 2011 were for the correct URIs, that are listed below:
http://www.opengis.net/def/cs/OGC/0/NED http://www.opengis.net/def/cs/OGC/0/ENU http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/ECI http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/ECI_GCRF http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/ECI_J2000 http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/ECI_M50
I attached the 2011 OGC-NA submission package in one of my previous comments and these were approved back then, along with everything else in that package (btw all other URIs in that package are correctly resolved by the OGC registry as of today).
For some reason, aliases for these CS/CRS where created at http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ (not something I requested), and although these aliases (incorrect URIs as you said) still refer to the correct original URIs (via exactMatch), the original definitions seem to have been removed/lost at some point.
Note that I'm not personally interested in the aliases since our software only refers to the original ones that, as you said, are the correct ones.
Thanks for the feedback.
I'll check the historic voting records and if I cannot find the definitions I'll begin a new vote to approve the definitions.
@ghobona Sounds good. Thanks
I have found a record of their previous registration, so will proceed to re-publish.
Please note that there is no record of http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/ECI, but instead there is http://www.opengis.net/def/cs/OGC/0/ECI
@ghobona Thanks. Yes, http://www.opengis.net/def/cs/OGC/0/ECI is the correct one.
The definitions have now been published.
@alexrobin @pebau @dr-shorthair Thanks for the support!
Some coordinate system definitions are not resolving properly:
http://www.opengis.net/def/cs/OGC/0/NED http://www.opengis.net/def/cs/OGC/0/ENU http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/ECI http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/ECI_GCRF http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/ECI_J2000 http://www.opengis.net/def/crs/OGC/0/ECI_M50
although they are still listed, respectively, as:
http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/NED http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ENU http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI_GCRF http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI_J2000 http://www.opengis.net/def/ogc/ECI_M50
but without the definition.
Thanks @alexrobin for finding the issue.